Third, two-dimensional reports have primarily been validated for consistency between reporters, rather than the predictive validity of idiosyncratic responses. Second, respondents report on two dimensions using one hand, which may produce method driven error, including spurious relationships between the two dimensions. First, current methods are primarily suited for bipolar, as opposed to unipolar, constructs. For all the variety of approaches, several limitations are inherent to most of them. Recent studies have extended continuous self-report methods to simultaneously collecting ratings on two dimensions of an experience. Research on fine-grained dynamic psychological processes has increasingly come to rely on continuous self-report measures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |